Debt Snowball vs Avalanche Calculator
Compare the snowball and avalanche payoff methods across all your debts — payoff time and total interest, side by side.
Enter your values and click Calculate
The two most popular debt payoff strategies attack the same problem in opposite orders. The debt snowball pays minimums on everything and throws every spare dollar at the smallest balance first — when it's gone, its minimum payment rolls into the next-smallest debt, building momentum and quick psychological wins. The debt avalanche instead targets the highest interest rate first, which is mathematically optimal: every dollar aimed at the most expensive debt eliminates the most future interest. This calculator runs both strategies on your actual debts. Enter up to five debts (balance, APR, and minimum payment for each — leave unused slots at zero) plus the extra amount you can pay beyond the minimums each month, and it simulates each method month by month: minimums are paid on every debt, the extra goes to the strategy's target debt, and freed-up minimums from paid-off debts snowball into the pool. The output shows time to debt-free and total interest under each method, side by side, along with the avalanche's dollar advantage. For most real debt mixes the avalanche saves money but the difference is smaller than people expect — often a few hundred dollars and a month or two — which is why the honest answer to 'which is better?' is: the one you'll stick with. If quick wins keep you motivated, the snowball's cost is usually modest; if you're strictly numbers-driven, the avalanche wins by construction.
How It Works
Both simulations follow the same monthly cycle on your real debt list. Each month, every open debt accrues interest (balance × APR ÷ 12) and receives its minimum payment. The extra payment — plus the minimum payments freed up by any already-eliminated debts — goes entirely to the strategy's target debt: the smallest remaining balance for the snowball, the highest APR for the avalanche. When a debt reaches zero, its minimum rolls into the pool from the following month, so your total monthly outlay stays constant while its focus shifts. The simulation runs until every balance reaches zero and reports months to debt-free and cumulative interest for each strategy. The avalanche can never lose this comparison mathematically — directing money at the highest rate always minimizes interest — but the gap depends on your specific mix: it's large when balances and rates are inversely ordered (big high-rate debts alongside small low-rate ones) and near zero when your smallest debts also carry the highest rates, making the two strategies choose the same targets. The model assumes fixed APRs, constant minimums, and no new borrowing.